Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Gary Austin Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
gary-austin
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Gary Austin

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 25, 2022

Gary Austin vs. Missouri State Highway Patrol, et al.

Appellant

Gary Austin appealed the denial of his petition to be removed from the Missouri Sex Offender Registry. Austin argued that his subsequent felony convictions and failure to complete probation occurred before his duty to register under the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), and thus should not preclude his removal. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, clarifying that Austin's registration duty arose under Missouri's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) and that the statutory conditions for removal were not met due to events occurring after his SORA registration obligation began.