Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Gregorio L. Davis Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
gregorio-l-davis
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Gregorio L. Davis

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Sep 15, 2020

State of Missouri vs. Gregorio L. Davis

Respondent

Gregorio L. Davis appealed his convictions for first-degree sodomy and fourth-degree domestic assault, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. Davis contended the State deliberately delayed his trial by dismissing and refiling charges to obtain a different judge after the deadline for a change of judge had passed. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, concluding that despite the State's tactical delay weighing heavily against it, the overall balance of the Barker factors did not establish a speedy trial violation given the relatively short delay and Davis's failure to show particularized prejudice.