Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as the Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, Missouri Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
gregory-fx-daly-in-his-official-capacity-as-the-collector-of-revenue-for-the-city-of-st-louis-missouri
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as the Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, Missouri

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Gregory F.X. Daly, the Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, appealed a circuit court judgment that found Mary Anne Helmsing's income from several limited liability companies was not subject to the City's earnings tax. The Collector argued Helmsing was precluded from challenging the taxes due to failure to pay under protest and that her income was taxable. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Helmsing was not precluded from challenging the taxes and that her income as a non-active limited partner was not "earned" income subject to the City's earnings tax.