Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

GREGORY HENSLEY Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
gregory-hensley
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving GREGORY HENSLEY

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Dec 8, 2020

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. GREGORY HENSLEY, Appellant

Appellant

Gregory Hensley appealed his convictions for driving while intoxicated (DWI) and driving with excessive blood alcohol content (BAC) following a bench trial. He argued the trial court erred by not suppressing breath analysis results due to a lack of probable cause for his arrest, and that without those results, there was insufficient evidence for conviction. The appellate court affirmed his convictions, finding no clear error in the trial court's determination of probable cause. However, the court remanded the case to correct a clerical error in the written judgment regarding the BAC charge.