Missouri Case Party

GREGORY LEON CRUMM, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: gregory-leon-crumm-defendant
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Criminal Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving GREGORY LEON CRUMM, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jul 22, 2025

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. GREGORY LEON CRUMM, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Gregory Leon Crumm was convicted of first-degree rape by forcible compulsion and first-degree statutory rape, stemming from a single act of sexual intercourse. He appealed, arguing that his convictions for both offenses violated his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, declining plain-error review and holding that convictions for both forcible rape and statutory rape for a single act do not constitute double jeopardy.

Criminal Law