Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Hawthorn Children's Psychiatric Hospital/State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Cross- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
hawthorn-childrens-psychiatric-hospital/state-of-missouri-appellant/crossrespondent-and-treasurer-of-the-state-of-missouri-as-custodian-of-the-second-injury-fund-cross
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Hawthorn Children's Psychiatric Hospital/State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Cross-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Maryann Gray filed workers' compensation claims, which an administrative law judge denied. Gray attempted to file applications for review with the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, but the initial mailing was returned for insufficient postage. The Commission ultimately found Gray's applications were timely filed due to a postal service error, and the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the Commission's factual findings regarding the September 30, 2019 postmark and sufficient postage were binding and supported by evidence.