Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Henniges Automotive Sealing Systems North America, Inc., Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
henniges-automotive-sealing-systems-north-america-inc-travelers-indemnity-company-of-america-and-treasurer-of-missouri-as-custodian-of-the-second-injury-fund
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Workers' Compensation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Henniges Automotive Sealing Systems North America, Inc., Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Linda Miller appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision to dismiss her Application for Review (AFR) of an administrative law judge's workers' compensation awards. The Commission dismissed Miller's AFR, finding it failed to comply with the specificity requirements of 8 C.S.R. 20-3.030(3)(A). The appellate court reversed the Commission's decision, holding that Miller's attached sheets to her AFR provided sufficient detail regarding her challenge to the ALJ's findings. The case was remanded to the Commission to overrule the motion to dismiss and proceed with Miller's AFR.