Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

HONORABLE C. WADE PIERCE and HONORABLE KACEY L. PROCTOR Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
honorable-c-wade-pierce-and-honorable-kacey-l-proctor
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving HONORABLE C. WADE PIERCE and HONORABLE KACEY L. PROCTOR

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Relator Andrew Bailey, Missouri Attorney General, sought a writ of prohibition against circuit judges C. Wade Pierce and Kacey L. Proctor, challenging the circuit court's authority to grant a second change of judge in a criminal case. The defendant and prosecutor had previously stipulated to a change of venue and judge. The Supreme Court issued a permanent writ of prohibition, holding that the circuit court lacked authority to grant the second change of judge under Rule 32.02, as the defendant did not allege any applicable exceptions. The Court ordered the circuit court to set aside its order and keep the case assigned to Judge Proctor.

Relator, the Missouri Attorney General, filed a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus, contending that the circuit court exceeded its authority by granting a defendant's second motion for change of judge in an underlying felony case. The Court of Appeals issued a preliminary writ and, after considering the parties' concessions, determined that the defendant was not entitled to a second change of judge. However, the court concluded it lacked the authority to designate a different judge or supersede the Supreme Court's transfer order, and therefore made the preliminary writ permanent as modified and transferred the case to the Supreme Court.