Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jacob Hilbert Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jacob-hilbert
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jacob Hilbert

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Supreme Court of Missouri / Mar 21, 2023

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Jacob Hilbert, Appellant.

Appellant

Jacob Hilbert appealed his conviction for first-degree statutory sodomy and child molestation, arguing the circuit court plainly erred by proceeding to a bench trial without a constitutionally sufficient waiver of his right to a jury trial and by admitting a victim's forensic interview video. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the judgment. The Court found Hilbert's waiver of a jury trial was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent based on the record, and that the admission of the video recording satisfied statutory requirements, thus finding no plain error.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 28, 2022

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Jacob Hilbert, Appellant.

Appellant

Jacob Hilbert appealed his convictions for statutory sodomy and child molestation, arguing the trial court plainly erred by conducting a bench trial without a constitutionally sufficient waiver of his right to a jury trial. The Eastern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals agreed, finding no unmistakable clarity in the record that Hilbert knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right. Consequently, the court vacated Hilbert's convictions and sentences and remanded the case for a new trial.