Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

JAMES D. MORELAND, Movant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
james-d-moreland-movant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving JAMES D. MORELAND, Movant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Feb 6, 2023

JAMES D. MORELAND, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Appellant

James D. Moreland appealed the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing his guilty plea was involuntary due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Moreland claimed his attorney inaccurately advised him he would receive probation and mental health court if he entered an open plea. The motion court found that both plea counsel and trial counsel testified they never guaranteed a specific sentence, and Moreland's plea colloquy confirmed no promises were made. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, concluding it did not clearly err in finding Moreland's plea was knowing and voluntary.