Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

James N. Rhymer Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
james-n-rhymer
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving James N. Rhymer

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 13, 2018

State of Missouri vs. James N. Rhymer

Respondent

James N. Rhymer appealed his convictions for second-degree murder, first-degree assault, kidnapping, and three counts of armed criminal action. He challenged the sufficiency of evidence for the kidnapping and one associated armed criminal action count, and alleged plain error in the jury instruction for kidnapping. The appellate court affirmed the murder, assault, and two armed criminal action convictions. However, it reversed the kidnapping and the related armed criminal action convictions, remanding for a new trial on those counts due to the instructional error that lowered the State's burden of proof.