Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jason Wolk, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jason-wolk-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jason Wolk, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 22, 2024

Jason Wolk, et al., Appellants, v. Grinnell Mutual Resinsurance Company, Respondent.

Appellant

Jason Wolk and Jeffrey Meyer, who were injured while working, disputed with Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company over a workers' compensation subrogation lien. After a personal injury suit and a subsequent settlement agreement, Appellants sought a declaratory judgment to interpret Section 287.150.3 and their agreement. The trial court awarded Grinnell the full amount of its lien, finding no mutual mistake in the agreement. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's amended judgment, agreeing with its interpretation of the statute and declining to rescind the settlement agreement.