St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jeannette M. Puetz, David M. Puetz, and Gerald B. Puetz Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jeannette-m-puetz-david-m-puetz-and-gerald-b-puetz
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Jeannette M. Puetz, David M. Puetz, and Gerald B. Puetz

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

The Puetz siblings appealed the denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment entered against them in favor of their former law firm, Zick, Voss, Politte & Richardson (ZVPR). ZVPR had obtained the default judgment after the Puetzes failed to file a responsive pleading within 30 days, relying on Rules 55.25(a) and 74.05(a). The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that these rules do not apply to civil cases originally filed in the Associate Circuit Division, which are governed by Chapter 517 RSMo, and thus the Puetzes were not in default as a matter of law.

Civil Litigation