Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Joan Koelling Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
joan-koelling
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Joan Koelling

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Joan Koelling sued Mercy Hospitals and Dr. Thomas Riechers for medical malpractice, alleging negligence in her post-operative care. A jury returned a verdict for the defendants. On appeal, Koelling argued the trial court abused its discretion by excluding evidence of the defense's expert witness, Dr. Kralovich's, prior involvement as a defendant in medical malpractice lawsuits, which Koelling sought to introduce to show bias. The Eastern District reversed and remanded, holding that the trial court abused its discretion by entirely prohibiting inquiry into the expert's litigation history, as such evidence was relevant to demonstrate bias and its exclusion prejudiced Koelling.