Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

John A. Gardner Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
john-a-gardner
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving John A. Gardner

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Virginia W. Crawford vs. John A. Gardner

Respondent

John A. Gardner appealed from a trial court judgment granting Virginia W. Crawford specific performance of a contract to buy Gardner's share of a co-owned general partnership. Gardner argued the trial court erred by finding a contract existed despite mutual mistake and non-compliance with notice requirements, and by awarding specific performance when Crawford allegedly failed to tender performance. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no mutual mistake, that the parties waived strict notice requirements, and that Gardner's repudiation waived Crawford's obligation to tender. The court also granted Crawford's motion for appellate attorney fees and remanded for their determination.