Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jon D. Knipp, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jon-d-knipp-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Jon D. Knipp, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 22, 2019

Blackwood, Langworthy & Tyson, LLC vs. Jon D. Knipp, et al

Respondent

Blackwood, Langworthy & Tyson, L.C. (Appellant) appealed the circuit court's grant of judgment on the pleadings, which dismissed its Petition for Accounting against Jon D. Knipp and Linda Miller (Respondents). Appellant sought to recover assets for professional services rendered to a conservatorship, arguing it was a "qualified claimant" under Section 461.300. The appellate court reversed, holding that Appellant's claim survived the conservatorship's closing, making it a "creditor" with standing, and that it did not waive its claim by accepting partial payment in the conservatorship's final settlement. The court also found Appellant's petition adequately stated a cause of action.