St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

JORDAN K. WOODS Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jordan-k-woods
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Criminal Law ConsultationCall About A Criminal Law Claim

Cases Involving JORDAN K. WOODS

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Feb 21, 2025

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. JORDAN K. WOODS, Appellant

Appellant

Jordan K. Woods was convicted of stealing after a bench trial and ordered to pay $85,202.31 in restitution. On appeal, Woods argued the trial court abused its discretion in awarding restitution due to conflicting and insufficient evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, declining plain error review because Woods failed to establish substantial grounds for believing a manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice resulted.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation