Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Julie Inman Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
julie-inman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Julie Inman

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Michael Kelly sought a writ of habeas corpus, arguing the circuit court violated his due process rights by accepting his not guilty by mental disease or defect (NGRI) plea after finding him incompetent to proceed with criminal proceedings. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed, holding that the circuit court exceeded its authority under section 552.020.8, RSMo, by accepting the plea instead of suspending proceedings and committing Kelly for mental health evaluation. The Court vacated Kelly's NGRI plea and ordered the circuit court to conduct a new examination within 90 days to determine his fitness to proceed.