Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Juvenile Office Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
juvenile-office
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Juvenile Office

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 21, 2020

In the Interest of: T.G. vs. Juvenile Office

Respondent

T.G., a 15-year-old, appealed his adjudication in family court for the class A misdemeanor of illegally possessing a deer. The juvenile court found T.G. committed the misdemeanor by attempting to load a deer into a vehicle. The appellate court reversed, finding insufficient evidence to support the adjudication because the Juvenile Office failed to prove that T.G.'s actions violated specific conservation commission regulations.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 25, 2020

In the Interest of: B.O. vs. Juvenile Office

Respondent

B.O. appealed the circuit court's judgment finding he violated probation and committed property damage, which resulted in his commitment to the Division of Youth Services (DYS). B.O. contended the court erred by committing him without a dispositional hearing and by finding insufficient evidence for two counts of property damage. The appellate court affirmed the findings of property damage but reversed and remanded the case, holding that the circuit court erred by failing to conduct a mandatory dispositional hearing in compliance with juvenile rules.