Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

KARL SCOTT LAMBERT and JOSEPH SCOTT LAMBERT, Defendants- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
karl-scott-lambert-and-joseph-scott-lambert-defendants
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving KARL SCOTT LAMBERT and JOSEPH SCOTT LAMBERT, Defendants-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Diane Lewis-Campbell appealed the trial court's judgment regarding the apportionment of a wrongful death settlement and the payment of attorney's fees. Lewis-Campbell, the mother of the decedent, and the decedent's minor children were claimants in a $2.5 million settlement. The trial court ordered each claimant to pay their attorney's fees as contracted from their share. The appellate court affirmed, holding that section 537.095 requires payment of attorney's fees as contracted when a valid agreement exists, and does not permit modification based on Rule 4-1.5 or allow fee sharing from other claimants when they have their own counsel before the settlement judgment is rendered.