Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kathleen Clair McKay-Montanari Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kathleen-clair-mckaymontanari
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kathleen Clair McKay-Montanari

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Joseph William Montanari vs. Kathleen Clair McKay-Montanari

Respondent

Joseph Montanari appealed the dismissal of his petition for damages against Kathleen McKay-Montanari, which the trial court found barred by res judicata. Joseph's petition sought damages related to Kathleen's alleged delay in filing a satisfaction of judgment following their divorce, an issue previously raised in a motion for contempt that was denied. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, concluding that res judicata properly applied as the claims arose from the same factual basis, and the trial court had the authority to raise the defense sua sponte. The court also remanded the case for a determination of attorney fees on appeal for Kathleen, deeming Joseph's appeal frivolous.