Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kenneth L. Evans Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kenneth-l-evans
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kenneth L. Evans

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 16, 2024

Angela M. Karstens, Respondent, vs. Kenneth L. Evans, Appellant.

Appellant

Angela Karstens filed a partition action against Kenneth Evans for the sale of their jointly owned home. The trial court awarded Karstens ordinary and substantial attorney's fees, to be paid entirely by Evans, and allocated the sale proceeds. Evans appealed the attorney's fees award. The appellate court reversed and remanded, finding the trial court erred by combining the ordinary and substantial attorney's fees without specifying amounts, and by awarding substantial attorney's fees because Evans' conduct did not meet the threshold for such an award.