Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

KEYMOND S. BROWN, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
keymond-s-brown-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving KEYMOND S. BROWN, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Dec 19, 2024

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. KEYMOND S. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Keymond S. Brown appealed his convictions for second-degree murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and armed criminal action, stemming from a fatal shootout. Brown contended the trial court erred by denying his motion to compel discovery of the victim's juvenile records, which he sought for his self-defense claim, and by admitting evidence of his attempt to fabricate an alibi while in juvenile detention. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding the trial court lacked authority to compel the juvenile records and that Brown failed to show their materiality, and that the alibi evidence was properly admitted as consciousness of guilt.