Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kimberly Abram, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kimberly-abram-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kimberly Abram, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Nov 21, 2023

Kimberly Abram, et al., Respondents, vs. Titlemax of Missouri, Inc., Appellant.

Respondent

TitleMax of Missouri, Inc. appealed the circuit court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration against Kimberly Abram and other plaintiffs, who had entered into loan agreements containing arbitration provisions. The plaintiffs had attempted to initiate arbitration with the American Arbitration Association (AAA), but the AAA declined to administer their claims due to TitleMax's non-compliance with its consumer rules. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, holding that AAA Rule R-1(d) authorized the plaintiffs to submit their disputes to the circuit court after the AAA declined to administer the arbitrations.