Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kristy McLeod Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kristy-mcleod
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kristy McLeod

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 25, 2021

Euan McLeod vs. Kristy McLeod

Respondent

Kristy McLeod appealed the trial court's judgment dissolving her marriage to Euan McLeod, which was based on an oral settlement agreement. Wife argued the trial court erred in denying her motion to set aside the agreement, in entering a judgment with an inconsistent maintenance provision, and in denying her motion to amend the judgment for omitted marital property. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding no error in the trial court's enforcement of the oral agreement, its maintenance provision, or its determination of finality regarding marital assets.