Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Lawrence G. Rebman Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
lawrence-g-rebman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Lawrence G. Rebman

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Lawrence Rebman, an administrative law judge (ALJ), sought a declaratory judgment that an appropriations statute (HB2007) was unconstitutional as applied to him and a permanent injunction to prevent his termination. The circuit court declared parts of HB2007 unconstitutional, severed the offending language, and enjoined the State from terminating Rebman's employment based on those provisions. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, holding that restricting funding for an ALJ's salary based on their appointment date violates the separation of powers by effectively compelling the executive branch to terminate a specific employee. The Court also affirmed the severability of the unconstitutional language and the permanent injunction.