This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
lee-allen-haneline
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Lee Allen Haneline appealed his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He argued the trial court erred in admitting evidence from a warrantless search of his lunchbox and that there was insufficient evidence to prove possession. The appellate court reversed and remanded for a new trial, finding that the search of the lunchbox violated Haneline's Fourth Amendment rights and that its admission was not harmless error. However, the court found there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, considering both admissible and inadmissible evidence.