This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
leo-a-cranford
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Leo Cranford appealed the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise him about the parole eligibility consequences of his guilty pleas for first-degree child molestation and first-degree statutory sodomy. The motion court denied the motion, concluding that parole eligibility is a collateral consequence about which counsel has no duty to inform. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the distinction between direct and collateral consequences remains valid in Missouri, and counsel's failure to advise on parole eligibility does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.