Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Lindsay Michelle Forbes Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
lindsay-michelle-forbes
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Lindsay Michelle Forbes

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Lindsay Michelle Forbes appealed her conviction for financial exploitation of an elderly person. The Missouri Supreme Court, acting sua sponte, determined that Forbes' initial notice of appeal was untimely because it was filed 15 days after the circuit court orally rendered judgment and imposed sentence. The Court further held that the circuit court's subsequent actions to withdraw the original sentence, resentence Forbes, and add restitution were void for lack of jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the case was remanded with directions to vacate the void judgment and enter a written judgment consistent with the original 10-year oral sentence.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 3, 2022

State of Missouri vs. Lindsay Michelle Forbes

Respondent

Lindsay Michelle Forbes appealed her conviction for the financial exploitation of an elderly person, her father, following a jury trial. She argued that the verdict-directing jury instruction erroneously criminalized a legal act by requiring the jury to find she obtained control of her father's assets by undue influence, despite having been legally appointed conservator by the probate court. The appellate court reversed the judgment, holding that the instruction was prejudicially erroneous because Forbes obtained control of the assets through a legal probate court order, not undue influence, and directed her discharge.