Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MAPLE GROVE FARMS, LLC, LEON RINEHART, TED DAHLSTROM, CAROL DAHLSTROM, CURTIS HALL, LISA HALL, and KYLE BOUNOUS, Defendants- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
maple-grove-farms-llc-leon-rinehart-ted-dahlstrom-carol-dahlstrom-curtis-hall-lisa-hall-and-kyle-bounous-defendants
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MAPLE GROVE FARMS, LLC, LEON RINEHART, TED DAHLSTROM, CAROL DAHLSTROM, CURTIS HALL, LISA HALL, and KYLE BOUNOUS, Defendants-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Maple Grove Farms, LLC and other defendants appealed a trial court order denying their motion to revoke or modify an interlocutory order appointing a receiver. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, dismissed the appeal, holding that the trial court's order was not appealable because it was not denominated a "judgment" or "decree" as required by Rule 74.01(a). The court followed Spiece v. Garland, clarifying that Sanford v. CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC did not implicitly overrule Spiece regarding the denomination requirement for appeals under section 512.020.