Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Marcellus Williams Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
marcellus-williams
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Marcellus Williams

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Marcellus Williams filed a motion to withdraw a warrant of execution, arguing it was premature because the St. Louis County prosecutor had filed a motion to vacate his conviction and death sentence under § 547.031, RSMo. Williams contended this prosecutor's motion qualified as a "state post-conviction motion" by "the defendant" under Rule 30.30(c), which would bar the court from setting an execution date. The Missouri Supreme Court overruled Williams' motion, holding that Rule 30.30(c) refers only to post-conviction motions filed by the defendant, not by the prosecutor, and therefore the prosecutor's pending § 547.031 action does not prevent the court from setting an execution date.