Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MARK ODOM Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
mark-odom
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MARK ODOM

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Mar 11, 2019

CUSTOMER ENGINEERING SERVICES, APPELLANT vs. MARK ODOM, RESPONDENT

Respondent

Customer Engineering Services (CES) appealed a workers' compensation award to Mark Odom for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits and past and future medical expenses. The appellate court affirmed the PTD and future medical expense awards, finding CES's arguments procedurally deficient or deferring to the Commission's credibility determinations. However, the court reversed in part the award for past medical expenses, holding that CES was not liable for expenses incurred before it received notice of Odom's need for further treatment. The case was remanded for the Commission to reduce the past medical expenses award.