Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Melissa Ann Glaze Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
melissa-ann-glaze
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Melissa Ann Glaze

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 18, 2020

State of Missouri vs. Melissa Ann Glaze

Respondent

Melissa Glaze appealed her convictions for possession of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia following a bench trial. She challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing the State failed to prove she had knowledge of and intent to control the contraband found in a vehicle she jointly occupied. The appellate court affirmed, finding sufficient additional incriminating circumstances, such as superior access to the contraband, its proximity to her personal belongings, her nervous demeanor, and her actions, to support the inference of knowing possession.