Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael Alan Mulvihill Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-alan-mulvihill
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael Alan Mulvihill

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Andrea Trueblood (Mother) appealed the trial court's judgment modifying the physical custody schedule and annually rotating the residential designation of her two children with Michael Mulvihill (Father). Mother contended that the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding that the annually alternating custody arrangement was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, deferring to the trial court's credibility determinations.