Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael Allen Black Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-allen-black
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael Allen Black

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 7, 2023

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Allen Black, Appellant.

Appellant

Michael Black appealed his conviction for second-degree murder and armed criminal action, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion by excluding evidence of the victim's past violent acts against third parties. Black claimed this evidence was admissible to support his self-defense claim by showing he had a reasonable fear of bodily harm or death. The Eastern District affirmed the conviction, holding that the circuit court properly excluded the evidence because Black's knowledge of the alleged acts was based on unreliable allegations and lacked sufficient detail.