Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael C. Schmidt Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-c-schmidt
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael C. Schmidt

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Feb 25, 2025

Michael C. Schmidt, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.

Appellant

Michael C. Schmidt appealed a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming an Appeals Tribunal's finding that he was overpaid $4,900 in unemployment benefits. The overpayment stemmed from a disqualification determination issued ten months after benefits were paid, which Schmidt argued was untimely and led to the bulk of the overpayment. The appellate court reversed, holding that the Division of Employment Security failed to comply with its statutory mandate to promptly examine claims and that the overpayment calculation was not supported by substantial evidence due to the Division's procedural delay.

Michael C. Schmidt appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision to dismiss his appeal as untimely in unemployment benefits proceedings. Schmidt had sent a letter challenging overpayment determinations, but the Commission construed it as an untimely application for review of a prior disqualification decision. The appellate court reversed, holding that Schmidt's letter was a timely appeal of the overpayment determinations and should have been treated as such.