Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MICHAEL EDWARD COX Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-edward-cox
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MICHAEL EDWARD COX

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jan 31, 2023

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. MICHAEL EDWARD COX, Appellant

Appellant

Michael Edward Cox appealed his misdemeanor convictions and an infraction, arguing the trial court erred by allowing him to represent himself without a valid waiver of counsel. Cox contended his written waiver did not comply with statutory requirements and the waiver hearing was not on the record. The Southern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals reversed Cox's misdemeanor convictions and remanded the case, finding plain error in the trial court's failure to ensure a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel. However, the court affirmed the judgment as to the infraction, noting the right to counsel does not extend to such offenses.