Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael Jones, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-jones-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael Jones, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 13, 2019

Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy, et al., v. Michael Jones, et al.

Respondent

Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy appealed a circuit court judgment in favor of the University of Central Missouri and state education entities, which had denied Banneker's claims for breach of contract, civil rights violations, and declaratory and injunctive relief related to the non-renewal of its charter. Banneker sought to prevent the closure of its school and compel contract renewal. The appellate court dismissed the appeal as moot, finding that the charter contract had expired and the school had closed, rendering the requested injunctive relief ineffectual and no exceptions to mootness applicable.