Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Miguel A. Torres Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
miguel-a-torres
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Miguel A. Torres

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jun 15, 2021

State of Missouri vs. Miguel A. Torres

Respondent

Miguel Torres appealed his convictions for possession of unlawful items in a county jail and damage to jail property, for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender. He argued the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior convictions due to late disclosure, that his double jeopardy rights were violated by multiple convictions for possessing different items simultaneously, and that the court improperly refused an entrapment defense instruction. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, affirmed the judgment, finding no discovery violation or fundamental unfairness, no double jeopardy violation as separate crimes were committed, and that entrapment was not an available defense for crimes involving placing persons in danger of physical injury.