Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Missouri Department of Natural Resources and St. Louis Composting, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
missouri-department-of-natural-resources-and-st-louis-composting-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Missouri Department of Natural Resources and St. Louis Composting, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Valley Park Properties, LLC appealed the Administrative Hearing Commission's dismissal of its challenge to a water discharge permit issued to St. Louis Composting, Inc. by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. The Commission dismissed the appeal as untimely, applying a thirty-day statutory limit. The appellate court reversed, holding that an administrative rule allowing an additional three days for appeals when notice is mailed was not in conflict with the statute's "except as otherwise provided by law" clause, thus making Valley Park's appeal timely. The case was remanded for further proceedings and consideration of Valley Park's motion for attorneys' fees.