Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Missouri State Highway Patrol, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
missouri-state-highway-patrol-et-al
Cases Shown
6
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Missouri State Highway Patrol, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Appellants K.A.C. and Michael Crites, Jr. sued the Missouri State Highway Patrol for wrongful death after a pursued driver collided with and killed Connor Crites. The trial court granted summary judgment for MSHP, finding Appellants failed to establish proximate cause. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Appellants did not produce sufficient facts to prove MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, consistent with Supreme Court precedent that proximate cause cannot be based on speculation in police pursuit cases.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 19, 2023

J.M.L., Respondent, vs. Missouri State Highway Patrol, et al., Appellant.

Appellant

J.M.L. filed a petition to be removed from the Missouri sex offender registry, which the circuit court granted. The Missouri State Highway Patrol appealed, arguing the circuit court erred by not determining if J.M.L. was required to register under federal SORNA. The appellate court reversed the circuit court's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings, finding that an incomplete record on appeal prevented proper review of the claim.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 25, 2022

Gary Austin vs. Missouri State Highway Patrol, et al.

Respondent

Gary Austin appealed the denial of his petition to be removed from the Missouri Sex Offender Registry. Austin argued that his subsequent felony convictions and failure to complete probation occurred before his duty to register under the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), and thus should not preclude his removal. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, clarifying that Austin's registration duty arose under Missouri's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) and that the statutory conditions for removal were not met due to events occurring after his SORA registration obligation began.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 5, 2019

Kimberly Harper and Sharon Kay Harper vs. Missouri State Highway Patrol, Et Al

Respondent

Kimberly Harper and Sharon Kay Harper sought an injunction under the Missouri Sunshine Law against the Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) to disclose records related to the shooting of Cpl. Bob Harper. The circuit court denied disclosure, finding the records protected under the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The appellate court reversed, holding that FOIA does not preempt the Sunshine Law for state agency records and that the records retained by MSHP are not "agency records" for FOIA purposes, thus making them subject to disclosure under state law.