Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Monique Ransom Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
monique-ransom
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Monique Ransom

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 30, 2021

Monique Ransom vs. State of Missouri

Appellant

Monique Ransom appealed the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The motion court had granted an extension for filing her amended motion after the initial 60-day deadline had passed. The appellate court reversed, holding that the motion court lacked authority to grant the extension after the deadline, rendering the amended motion untimely. The case was remanded for the motion court to conduct an inquiry into whether Ransom was abandoned by post-conviction counsel.