Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

NATALIE LANE CHAMPAGNE, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
natalie-lane-champagne-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving NATALIE LANE CHAMPAGNE, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Oct 17, 2018

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. NATALIE LANE CHAMPAGNE, Defendant-Respondent

Respondent

The State of Missouri appealed the trial court's order suppressing evidence in a driving while intoxicated (DWI) case against Natalie Lane Champagne. The suppression order was based on the trial court's finding that the initial traffic stop, initiated due to a single functioning brake light, was unlawful. The appellate court reversed, holding that Missouri Revised Statute § 304.019.1(4) requires all manufacturer-installed stoplights to be in operating condition, making the traffic stop lawful. The case was remanded for further proceedings.