Missouri Case Party

Neill Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: neill
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Civil Litigation

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Criminal Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Litigation Consultation Call About A Litigation Claim

Cases Involving Neill

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Supreme Court of Missouri / Jan 9, 2024

In re: Joseph V. Neill, Respondent

Respondent

In this original disciplinary proceeding, Joseph Neill stipulated to professional misconduct, including sexual harassment of a client. The disciplinary hearing panel recommended a stayed suspension with probation, but the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel rejected the probation aspect. The Supreme Court of Missouri held that Neill was ineligible for probation under Rule 5.225(a)(2)(C) because he committed acts warranting disbarment, even with mitigating factors. Consequently, the Court suspended Neill's license indefinitely with no leave to apply for reinstatement for six months.

Civil Litigation Criminal Law