Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Nicholas A. Barton Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
nicholas-a-barton
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Nicholas A. Barton

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Nicholas A. Barton was arrested by Poplar Bluff police officers in Campbell, outside their territorial jurisdiction, for felony robberies not committed in their presence. The circuit court sustained Barton's motions to suppress evidence, finding a Fourth Amendment violation. The Missouri Supreme Court vacated the circuit court's decision, holding that a warrantless felony arrest is constitutionally reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if supported by probable cause, even if the crime was not committed in the arresting officer's presence or within their jurisdiction. The Court also found that Barton's motion did not adequately raise a claim of lack of probable cause.