Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Nina Theroff Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
nina-theroff
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Nina Theroff

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Nina Theroff, a former employee, sued Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. for disability discrimination. Dollar Tree moved to compel arbitration, which the circuit court denied without making specific findings of fact. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's order, holding that when there is a factual dispute about the existence of an arbitration agreement due to a lack of assent, the court, not an arbitrator, must first determine if an agreement exists. The Court found that the circuit court implicitly found no agreement existed, and this finding was supported by substantial evidence.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 24, 2018

Nina Theroff vs. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Janie Harper

Appellant

Nina Theroff, a former employee, sued Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. for disability discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act. Dollar Tree moved to compel arbitration, asserting Theroff had digitally signed a mutual arbitration agreement. The trial court denied the motion without making factual findings, and Dollar Tree appealed. The appellate court affirmed, holding that there was substantial evidence to support the trial court's implicit finding that no arbitration agreement was "concluded" between the parties, as Theroff testified she did not sign it or authorize anyone to sign on her behalf.