Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Police Retirement System of Kansas City, Missouri Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
police-retirement-system-of-kansas-city-missouri
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Police Retirement System of Kansas City, Missouri

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 23, 2021

Heather M. Bass vs. Police Retirement System of Kansas City, Missouri

Respondent

Heather Bass, a former police officer, and the Police Retirement System of Kansas City (PRSKC) cross-appealed a circuit court's summary judgment regarding the calculation of an offset to Bass's duty-related disability pension benefits due to her worker's compensation award. Bass challenged the inclusion of investment income in the offset, the denial of her motion to amend her petition, the mortality assumptions used for life expectancy, and the denial of prejudgment interest. PRSKC challenged the exclusion of attorney's fees and costs from the offset calculation. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in its entirety.