Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Professional Funding Company Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
professional-funding-company
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Professional Funding Company

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Joseph F. Bufogle, Sr. and Bufogle & Associates, P.C. (Bufogle) appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to Professional Funding Company (PFC) on its breach of contract claim. Bufogle argued that PFC anticipatorily breached a settlement agreement by filing suit before Bufogle's first payment was due, thereby excusing Bufogle's performance. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment, holding that PFC did not anticipatorily breach the contract because Bufogle was unaware of the lawsuit until after his payment was due, and he did not accept any alleged repudiation.

Professional Funding Company (PFC) sued Joseph F. Bufogle, Sr., and Bufogle & Associates, P.C., for breach of a settlement agreement. The trial court sua sponte entered judgment for PFC by adopting an exhibit from a prior settled case as a consent judgment, before Bufogle had filed an answer. Bufogle appealed the denial of his motion to set aside the judgment. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the exhibit was not a valid consent judgment and the sua sponte entry of judgment violated Bufogle's due process rights and civil procedure rules.