Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jul 28, 2009
Missouri Case Party
QuikTrip Corporation Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
- Party ID
- quiktrip-corporation
- Cases Shown
- 5
- Top Practice Route
- Personal Injury
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Cases Involving QuikTrip Corporation
Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable
QuikTrip Corporation, Appellant, v. City of St. Charles, Missouri, Jennifer O'Connor, and Zachary Tusinger, Respondents.
Quicktrip (QT) filed a declaratory judgment action against the City of St. Charles, challenging a tourism tax and its enforcement, after the City retroactively applied the tax and took actions like withholding permits. The trial court dismissed QT's petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court affirmed, holding that QT was required to exhaust its administrative remedies, even if it initiated its lawsuit first, and that its constitutional challenges were mixed with factual and statutory construction issues that also required administrative resolution.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable
Margaret Jaccard Richardson, Appellant v. Quiktrip Corporation, Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable
Tracy Baldwin, Assessor, Clay County, Missouri vs. Quiktrip Corporation
The Clay County Assessor appealed the circuit court's judgment affirming the State Tax Commission's order, which set the assessed value of QuikTrip Corporation's retained interest in a former gas station property at zero dollars. QuikTrip had sold the property but reserved use restrictions, a right of first refusal, and mineral rights. The Assessor argued these interests constituted taxable real property and that the Commission erred in its valuation and application of the burden of proof. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that the use restrictions and right of first refusal were not taxable real property, and the mineral rights, while taxable, were correctly valued at zero dollars based on their current non-use and lack of permitting.
Supreme Court of Missouri / Date unavailable