Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Ray A. Johnson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
ray-a-johnson
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Ray A. Johnson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 28, 2020

State of Missouri vs. Ray A. Johnson

Respondent

Ray A. Johnson appealed his convictions for first-degree murder and armed criminal action, arguing the State made an improper acquittal-first argument during closing statements. The appellate court agreed that the State's argument was an improper misstatement of the law. However, the court affirmed the convictions, finding that the trial court did not plainly err by failing to intervene sua sponte, as the error was not outcome-determinative given Johnson's defense strategy and the strong evidence of deliberation. The court also clarified that claims of prosecutorial misconduct on direct appeal must be framed as trial court error.